War of Lies

Chapter 2: Implication of Evil

The so-called “Russian atrocities” that would follow would take another even darker turn. The above is a view of burnt buildings. There are several points about this image. The first point of note is that the buildings, although charred, have no noticeable structural collapse, in particular the roof lines are intact.

The above images are from real bombs dropped in the war between Isreal and the Hamas. These bombs cause extensive structural collapse unlike "Russian weapons" used in Ukraine.

The two images above show fires in largely uncombustable structures such as the one in Mariupol.

The second point of note is the pattern of charring from the fire. Fires tend to burn upwards as shown above. This is especially true of concrete shell building like these that have very little flammable material on the outside. The charing in the Mariupol image indicates that the fire probably started at multiple locations all around the culdesac and then went upward from multiple points.

The above is the building in Mariupol again. The third point of interest is that the charing for the most part does not reach down to the ground level. The majority of scorch marks appear to originate from the second story. In the building on the front right a fire appears to have started 6 stories up. The fourth point is the lack of pitting or any indication of impacts from rockets or shells on the sides of the buildings.

The fifth point is THERE IS NO INDICATION OF CHARRING OR IMPACTS IN THE COURTYARD.

How would the Russians do this? If it was normal artillery why aren't the tops of the buildings destroyed, why aren't there impact marks on the sides of the buildings and why the hell aren't there any impact marks in the center of the courtyard? Furthermore how does Russian artillery apparently fly through open windows mostly on the lowest stories leaving no visible impact marks on the sides of the buildings? How do the Russians hit all of the buildings surrounding the trees with incendiaries and totally not burn down the trees in the interior of the courtyard? Also if incendiary shells were showered down wouldn't the scorch marks not only be present in the courtyard, but begin at the lowest story not one or more stories up in most cases? Why didn't the buildings that are facing eachother shield eachother from the Russian shells? Are the Russians shooting from the middle of the courtyard? If we didn't have the caption to tell us this was a "Russian atrocity" caused by "Russian artillery" wouldn't it look kinda like incendiary devices were planted at multiple locations inside the concrete ovens and then the ovens were lit on fire possibly using their own gas supply? Most buildings in Ukraine use gas for heating and gas is notorious for explosive fires if the lines are left open during a blaze. We do however have the reassurance of the Ukrainian authorities that the buildings were filled with ethnic Russian men, women and children at the time they incinerated. We also have well documented instances of elite Ukrainian units using SS flags essentially identical in designs to those used by the 3rd Reich.

It is possible that ethnic Russian civilians, of which this city is full, inspired by the near proximity of the Russian army holed up in the upper stories of their apartments with their families and AK-47s. They may have fired on the Ukrainian military when it attempted to clear them. Not being able to easily dislodge the armed civilians by a direct assault, the Ukrainians may have resorted to fire. This would account for multiple fires starting in the ring almost all near the base of the buildings.