Who Sells the Dead?

Chapter 2: The Neo-Gestapo

Then came Bucha. Bucha is when the SS flags waving around Zelensky's elite units took on real significance. Bucha was captured and held for weeks by the Russian army. They even released photos of themselves in the town. In one photo released by Radio Free Europe (an American site originally operated by the CIA) two Russian soldiers are standing next to a destroyed armored personal carrier. Neither of these soldiers even has a rifle on them. The building to the right are clearly visible with the green lawns and completely undamaged. Other photos of Bucha released by the Ukrainians also show essentially undamaged buildings. However after capturing the town the Russians were forced to retreat.

The pro-Ukranian mayor of the town then released a happy statement about the town being "free" but forgets to mention anything about bodies lining the streets for some reason. Around four days later the Ukrainian army occupies the town. Shortly thereafter they release a video of the streets lined with the dead bodies of the townsfolk. These people are reported to have been shot execution style in the back of the head. The bodies however show no signs of decay - no bloating or discoloration. Furthermore there are no indications of tearing by the many scavenging animals and birds that live in the rural regions around these tiny little towns. Pictures of the Ukrainians transporting the bodies also show no indication of insects, not one of the people carrying the bodies around is so much as blinking or swatting a fly. None of them is wearing eye protection either. Rotted human corpses and insects are notorious for transmitting disease. Why do none of Zelensky's neo-nazis bother with eye protection? Other bodies are recorded by the Ukrainians in what they claim are mass graves. One of these, a poor women I remember clearly from the Ukrainian video released by radio free Europe. This woman far from showing any sign of the usual processes of nature still had color in her cheeks. She might have been sleeping if most of her face wasn't already buried in dry dirt by her murders. Not only that, in spite of the caption claiming she was being dug up from a mass grave there wasn't a single stain on her cheek or her bright pink jacket. A loose shovelful of dry dirt was partly thrown over her. From the state of her clothes it is physically impossible that she was ever actually buried. Any gardener knows that after about 6 inches the ground is damp in temperate climates and this "Ukraine" is such a dry country that Russian tanks were wallowing by 4+ ft deep mud.

The Ukrainian propaganda of course told the weak minded what to think: "this is a Russian atrocity" and Zelensky demanded more weapons from the US. Anyone who has served in Iraq, Afghanistan or Vietnam or followed these conflicts in any serious degree is aware that it is practically impossible to capture a hostile town which is providing willing shelter to enemy combatants without wiping out a significant portion of the town or taking extensive casualties. In fact the precision strikes on the Ukrainian armored vehicles such as the one the Russians were posing next to are almost impossible without active help from the townsfolk. There was probably a GRU team that was sheltered by the people of the town which painted that vehicle for the Russian helicopters. The lack of weapons on the Russian soldiers also clearly indicates they felt safe in the middle of a friendly town. It is also visible in the video the Ukrainians released that a number of the dead have Russian aid packets in the vicinity of their bodies. It appears that the Russian army handed out food packets in the town sometime after they captured it. Why would the Russian's massacre their own supporters? If in-fact the town was hostile, in spite of clear indications to the contrary, why would the Russians take significant casualties to capture the building safely if they were just going to indiscriminately murder the civilians anyway? If the Russians were going to massacre hostile townsfolk, why wouldn't they kill them within the first day or two after taking the town? Why would they leave them running around free for weeks and then randomly walk down the streets right before they left gunning these people down (taking particular care to kill any one who accepted a Russian aid packet of course)? Why would the Russians leave the bodies in the streets for Zelensky to sell? According to the Ukrainians the Russians have taken around 100,000+ casualties not the few thousand that they reported. If the Russians are so good at hiding tens of thousands of bodies to falsify their casualty reports why didn't they also hide the few hundred bodes from Bucha? For that matter why leave the bodies in the street at all? Did the Russians try to sell the bodies in a propaganda video for weapons? However in the end it is physically impossible for the Russians to have committed the crime in the video made by the Neo-NAZIs in the days if not weeks that the bodies lay in the street they would have bloated, stiffened, and been scavenged by some of the billions of creatures in the Earth's biosphere that feed on exposed corpses. And yes the unit that "liberated" Bucha is the Neo-NAZI unit of elite supporters of Zelensky: the Azovs, notable among other things for their anti-ethnic Russian ideology, love of Hitler and widespread use of SS flags and swatzikas.

Zelensky's jihadists did realize their mistake, a little late. The trouble with modern day NAZI's is they are never real high on the IQ spectrum - as in they are usually somewhere down there with the ape. They then claimed "experts" had identified the lethal execution-style wounds in the bodies as "Russian needle artillery". This essentially trades a biological physical impossibility for a mechanical physical impossibility. Shrapnel does not vanish when it hits the ground streets, buildings, glass, walls, trees, animals and any part of the human body except the head. There were no "needles" photographed anywhere in anything. And where were all the wounded? Artillery shrapnel does not have a guidance system; most hits would have go into random objects and the majority of humans would have suffered wounds, not execution style shots to the head. Also artillery does not bury its victims in mass graves. And this is supposing that "Russian needle artillery" even exists.

Ok that didn't work so the neo-nazis have not given up. Their newest claim, made months after the "needle artillery", is that there is a satellite image that shows bodies in the streets weeks before the video was taken. In other words, somebody ordered a extremely high resolution satellite camera, of which very few exists, to take extremely high resolution images at the precise location of Bucha at almost the precise time the Russians entered the town and then just forgot about it for months on end but fortunately they just remembered some time after the ludicrous claim of needle artillery failed. Or was someone watching the massacre as it took place in Bucha for weeks but somehow decided it wasn't actually worth publishing? not only for the weeks the Russians were there but also for months afterwards? Or was it taken weeks after the Ukrainians retook the town? Also orbit time is on the order of an hour or two for satellites low enough to take high resolution images. So the satellite should pass over Bucha at least once a day directly and have additional chances to photograph at a slight angle as the earth rotates. Why are there so few pictures? Shouldn't there be dozens of pictures of the bodies at different stages of the purge? Also who exactly is verifying the date and time of the images, the CIA perhaps? And we all know how honest the CIA is. In the end though this would only go on to prove that the laws of physics do not apply in Ukraine since a huge number of observers including myself can directly testify to these bodies being incorruptible for now weeks on end, or else the massacre is continuing long after the Azovs regained control of Bucha. Btw is their any reason the New York Times is even referred to as "news" anymore?

The satellite images do bring up an important point. If one or more western satellites are infact orbiting over Bucha then the situation in Bucha would have been continously monitored by these satillites. The bodies in the street would obviously have been visible if they were in fact there. Even if the civilian companies did not have coverage of Bucha in real time surely the CIA did. Why didn't the CIA release the news of the "Russian" atrocity days before the Azovs entered Bucha? Is the reason that not even the CIA released a report of the dead lining the streets before the Russians left, that the dead bodies didn't appear until after Zelensky's "liberators" arrived?

Chapter 3: False Flag

Ethnic Russians however may not be the only target of the Neo-NAZI's it appears that zelensky has even tried to sell the deaths of his own allies. There are reports which of two instances where stray Ukrainian missiles slaughtered Poles. In the first instance, which I have not confirmed, the missile hit a farmer on a tractor. In the second instance a village house was demolished. zelenksy originally claimed that the missile was Russian. Then when it was proven that the missile actually came from Ukraine he claimed it was an accident.

The picture on the left above is a zoomed out picture of the area around the tiny little village where the missile killed two people. The picture on the right above is the a close view of the tiny village surrounded by farmland. What are the odds that zelensky's missile could "accidentally" miss not only the entire country it was fired at but also all of the surrounding farmland and massacre two people by demolishing their tiny house? The Polish president though is too busy using the war as an excuse to ban opposition political parties under the name of opposing "Russia" to object to his allies blowing up Polish citizens.