ULM: the Begining

800 Years of Russian-Polish Conflict and Biden's War

When the Russian-Ukrainian war started the Russians appeared to have gone over their western boarder with little provocation and very confused reasons for the invasion. This was the story presented repeatedly by all the major corporate western media outlets to the elimination of any other view points. However this is very far from the real story. Although the Russian governments actions were bizarre and there was a near complete failure on the part of the ranking members of the Russian regime to present a reasonable case for their actions; their targets were and are very far from innocent victims. The real reasons for this war hearkens back over 800 years and involve all major players in Eurasia of whom there is only one real winner. The situation inside of Russia and the real and dire threat poised by the puppet-master that orchestrated this war are discussed elsewhere. This article will simply focus on the Ukrainian regime and its so-called news.

To begin with what is now called Ukraine started out as Russia back in the 10th century. The proto-state that later became Russia started with the Kievian Rus in what is now called "Ukraine". This proto-state was subjugated by the Mongolian invasion in the 12th century when its capital Kiev was destroyed. About this time the Poles took advantage of Russia's weakened state to invade from the west thus creating their "Ukraine" from captive Russians. The Russians later got back together in the east and in the 14th century and moved their capital from Kiev to Moscow. The boarder has been sweeping hundreds of miles across eastern Europe for centuries since with the Poles shoving it as far as possible to the east and the Russians shoving it back to the west. It is well known that the Russians got Warsaw in 1945 what is lesser known is that the Poles took Moscow back in the 15th century. These people have been fighting over that d--- boarder for over 800 years. There is absolutely no real reason why its belongs in any particular location and there is no historical justification for the location of the boarder. Historically it has been all over the d--- map.

To the extent that their is a national preference; the western section of "Ukraine" largely west of the river speaks Ukrainian and has been practicing Roman Catholicism answering to the Pope. The eastern half or so of the country east of the river tends to speak Russian and practice Eastern Catholicism. The boarders of the modern "Ukraine" were created under the Soviet Union by Lenin. When the reds took over the cities and the eastern section of Russia tended to go with the Marxist. The rural western section however stayed loyal to the Tsar. The battle lines of the Russian civil war are very close to where Lenin divided the country probably putting all the bad eggs in the same basket. The rebel "Ukrainians" including the white Russians were then put last in line for rations when all of Russia starved in the days of Stalin. This led to many of the white Russian farmers perishing in the famine. This did not endear Moscow to white-Russia and when the Soviet Union dissolved the Frankenstein state of "Ukraine" succeeded from Russia. This may have been a popular act reflecting the troubled history of white-Russia but even this is questionable.

The regional governments of the Soviet Union including that of Ukraine were notorious for their corruption. In this case the "Ukrainian" government claimed 98% support in a vote for the creation of an independent state under their rule. This number is completely implausible but the motive for this claim by the corrupt Ukrainian politicians is clear. The new "Ukraine" was a centralized state where all major corporations were controlled by the government. This means that by retaining control of the resource rich regions in eastern "Ukraine" the Ukrainian government could skim directly off the labor of the miners and steel workers greatly to the profit of the oligarchs in Kiev. However the situation was not nearly as satisfactory to their downtrodden employees in the east forced to work for slave wages and live in towns contaminated by industrial waste. While the Ukrainian oligarchs and the western Ukrainians drew ever closer to the EU which profited from the kind of deal on steel and coal, which can only obtained by a lack of labor and environmental laws; the exploited laborers of the east looked for alternatives. The eastern section of "Ukraine" started turning back towards their historical ethnic ties to Russia. Around 2010 the eastern section, the Russian section of "Ukraine", won out aided by some of the Ukrainian westerners and "Ukraine" started its own little Slavic Union with Russia.

The EU was not happy. They started a smear campaign and when this didn't work and the pro-Russian element was elected a second time in 2014 they started in on more direct measures. They funded initially peaceful protest; however peaceful protest failed so the elites of the EU resorted to the "people's" revolution. The "people" in this revolution waving SS flags and AK-47s as the Ukrainian capital burns about them and the elected president flees the country in fear of his life. The "peaceful (SS) protesters" with their AK-47s then descend on the Crimea intent on driving the Russian military out of "Ukraine"; Russians swarm out of their bases like hornets and Ukrainians taxation of the Crimea ends. Something that is generally not mentioned by the western press is that Russia never completely ceded the Crimea to Ukraine. It had been under Ukrainian administration since the days of USSR and therefor the Ukrainian government kept right on taxing the people and administering the region. However the Russian military was never seriously expected to leave and the actual status of the territory was never really resolved in the minds of the majority of the Russian people just ignored by both governments.

In the mean time the farthermost eastern and strongly Russian Dombas region is starting their own schism. The region is dominated by mining and steel the workers who are likely less than enamored with their state-controlled corporate leadership now waving SS flags. Probably not looking forward to strike breakers/swatzika fanciers. Protests in the Dombas were originally peaceful but either due to "helpful" Russians or aggression on the part of the Neo-NAZI thugs or both the situation in the Dombas becomes violent. The first major atrocity of the Russian-Ukrainian conflict is soon afterwards committed.

The Ukrainian army upon fleeing the Dombas did not manage to take their massive surface to air missile systems out on their backs. These vehicles designed to shoot down supersonic American aircraft flying at extreme altitude are abandoned and now in the hands of the rebels. It is only a matter of time before they become operational. The CIA in spite of full awareness of the capacities of these systems and their existence chooses instead to release a murderously false statement to the press stating that their was only danger at low altitude. Kiev now launching aerial assault after aerial assault on the Dombas region, in a technique reminiscent of Iran, also starts vectoring air traffic directly into the kill zone. The rebels warn all aircraft to stay out of the region as it is a war zone and are all but ignored by the western press. Russia shuts off the flight paths entering the Russian boarder over the Dombas. However Ukrainian airtraffic control continues to direct aircraft after aircraft into a war zone over the boarder of a country they are practically at war with. Western aircraft after western aircraft divert to the north, to the south refusing their Ukrainian flight plan. Hundreds of aircraft divert but the Ukrainians still get their victim. The same Indonesian airline that just a few months before had sent a plane full of Chinese Infidels into the ocean now flies another few hundred Infidels directly into the kill zone. Sure enough the SA300 is armed an fully operational. Freshly informed of the kill the American president happily announces that he knows exactly where the missle came from. How could Obama be watching the missile in its entire trek to the specific SA300 that killed every man woman and child on that airplane and not know that that SA300 existed? The Obama administration not only never once questioned the deadly traffic control of their ally but continued to release a murderously false reassurance of it safety. The victims of this flight have an excellent case against the action of the CIA the American government and the murders in Kiev. Every nation on this planet fires at intruders when under attack; however vectoring an aircraft into a war is as innocent as vectoring it deliberately into a volcano. The corporate Western press of course placed the blame entirely on Russia and proved that repetitious gibbering has great power over the weak minded.

As the conflict over the Dombas progressed neither side advanced much and it finally settled down mostly into an artillery duel. The Minsk accords were supposed to end the shooting but were generally disregarded by the Ukrainian government. In the years that followed 2014 only a few civilians were killed per year; however continued shelling by the Ukrainians tended to suppress and depopulate the region. There is no real independent assessment during these years of the disposition or real political allegiance of the people in either the Crimea or the Dombass region although the intermittent shelling by the Ukrainians probably was not adding to the pro-Ukrainian sentiment in the Dombass.

With the most pro-Russian regions of "Ukraine" no longer voting in the Ukrainian election, the elections that were close before now went over to clear Ukrainian/EU victories and the Neo-NAZI Azovs made massive inroads into the Ukrainian government. The situation for the ethnic Russians of the eastern section of "Ukraine" no doubt worsened over these years. While an actual "genocide" is not proven; there are suggestions of political repression and the probability of at least political murders. At the very least it appears that the state-run educational system was being used to ethnically cleanse the Russians of their own identity. Rewritten history demonizing Russia; banns on Russian children learning in Russian; pressure to prevent children from being raised by pro-Russian educators probably even including their own parents. There was also some very public intimidation practiced by ranking members of the Ukrainian government demanding that the ethnically Russian eastern populations surrender their historically Russian identity and allegiance to their traditional Church led by the Patriarch of Moscow. There is no direct evidence that I know of of murders perpetuated by the Ukrainian government at this time and none were mentioned by the Russian leadership; however even the leaders of the Russian government may not have known exactly what was going on. (This is discussed elsewhere) Furthermore the events that would later occur in Bucha are suggestive of that there has been a network of informers with the capacity of lethal retaliation against political deviants working in association with the Azovs even before the Russian-Ukrainian war. It should also be considered that the only way to permanently safeguard the rich natural resources of "eastern Ukraine" in the hands of the western politicians against ethnic Russians voting for succession would be to eliminate the Russians.

The majority of Russians, whether accurately or not believe that violent repression was used against their ethnic Russian brothers in Ukraine and many sources including many western media outlets have documented the very obvious Neo-NAZI sentiments and symbols characterizing the elite units in the Ukrainian army. During this time period older Russians and probably more rural Russians tended towards support for intervention while the younger generation in the cites, who are of age for the draft, showed a strong preference for a peaceful solution.

Russia and Ukraine are thus balanced on the edge of war; when Biden gave them a shove. Biden declared his intention to add Ukraine to NATO. While most Americans completely ignored the windbag in this as well as his other effusions of hot air unfortunately the Russians did not. Biden's statement was NOT innocent; in fact is was a declaration of intent to wage war on Russia. NATO defends a nation's boarders. The Ukrainian government which Biden would be adding to NATO defines those boarders as including the Crimea and the Dombass region. The Dombass region was recognized by Russia as an independent Russian ally and the Crimea was and is considered by Russia as PART OF RUSSIA. Defending Ukrainian boarder claims requires an invasion of Russia. Biden furthermore without the authorization of congress to commit an act of war and without the knowledge of the vast majority of the American people moved the American military into Ukraine further provoking the Russians. The majority of Russians at this point are convinced that Biden and NATO intend to attack them. When the Russian army advances into Ukraine it does so with the support of the significant majority of the Russian people who unfortunately pay far more attention to the Beijing-brought shit-talking shitbag of a president than 90 percent of the country whose capital he occupies. The war then begins and the corporate press, also with strong economic ties to the one nation that wins the Russian-American war, tells us all what to think while leaving out 99% of the facts as a matter of routine.