War of Lies

Chapter 1: the Ludicrous

Shortly after the Russian invasion the first wave of Ukrainian propaganda came out and the Ukrainians begin to show their true colors. One of the earliest images of a "Russian atrocity" courtesy of Fox "News" was an “bombed art school” building. A school building, presumably a dorm, of the cleanest most orderly non-Bohemian art students in existence. Each room was furnished with a set of perfect bright blue cushions. This could be seen since half of the building was sheared off through 3ft thick concrete floors. Even though the "Russian bomb" not get a speck of dust on the cushions the bomb some how atomized all the 3 ft thick concrete floors for an entire half of the building since there wasn't a single solid slab remaining anywhere in the collapsed wreckage. This entire setup was filmed and staged by a Pakistani (Osama Bin Ladan's home country) Unfortunately Fox "News" has since taken down the story.

Image Credit: Microsoft News

Then picture of "bombed" buildings like the one above emerged. Note the very dense configuration of roof slats with no obvious holes. If this was direct hit, how does a bomb fly with such precision through the roof? Where is the cratering? If this was not bombed from above but a blast effect, where is the damage to the trees? Why wasn't the back side of the roof blown off as the blast presumably went through the now open roofing? Also how did the bomb have enough force to blow all the roofing off but NOT ENOUGH BLAST to knock it off the roof? Much of the damaged roofing is just resting on the edge of the roof. Why isn't the building right next to it also showing significant blast damage? Why didn't they show the principle crater? If this is blast damage where is the primary crater and the ring of devastation around it? Furthermore why do Russian bombs repaint random sections of a building? Now if a wreaking claw was involved... but the caption says bomb so...?

Here is another image also indicating that Russian bombs give buildings a creative paint job. In one section the "bomb" completely removed the siding in a neat line revealing white under paint. In another section it painted the bricks green. It also messed up the strange gray paint near the windows scraping it to white. And even added some messy blue paint. Notice that the building in the background that had no attention from "Russian bombs" for some reason also has a normal paint job. Notice also how there is no cratering whatsoever, no irregular edges or signs of major structural damage. Furthermore the debris is outside and very close to the building. How does a blast just drop debris directly down? If it had come with such force from the inside wouldn't the debris be thrown further out? And if it came from the outside wouldn't most of the debris be inside the building? Also how does a bomb impact a building with such force that it randomly shears of a couple of brick/concrete balcony edges, takes the bark of a tree, but leaves the wood balcony lattices intact? Now if this was a wreaking ball dropped on the three balconies to the right and swung into the one on the left...

Image Credit: Bart Everson / Flickr
but the caption says "Russian bomb" so?

Image Credit: Ukrainian Government: Volodymyr Trush / Reuters

This is the next exhibit also sold to the press by Ukraine as a "Russian atrocity" which supposidly killed 22 people: a building hit by what is probably a Russian water bomb and flying wreaking ball combo. The side of the building clearly shows a patchwork of missing bricks and marked water stains overlapping the region where the bricks are missing from the masonry.

Curiously as can be seen from the A-bomb test, even a nuclear blast does not remove individual bricks. In one nuclear test the blast hit so hard that the entire brick chimney was rotated by 20 to 30 degrees but still no missing bricks.
Image Credit: masonry.com
However there is a type of "bomb" that does this destruction. The above image is from a site on water damage. Water it turns out as it drains down the side of a building over time erodes the masonry leading to individual bricks falling out. Curious that the missing bricks in the "Russian atrocity" just happen to overlap the water stains. Although a wreaking ball could also smash and dislodge bricks. Furthermore one of the metal railings has a huge dent in it and the other is knocked clear off its moorings. How the hell does a bomb generate enough blast to bend a skeletal metal structure that has almost no resistance to the shock wave but not enough to take down the wall that is going to catch the full force of the blast? In A-bomb tests skeletal structures withstood blasts that wiped entire concrete and brick houses off the earth. It is just a coincidence that the depression in the bottom metal balcony frame looks kinda like the inverse of the side of a wreaking ball...

Another strange point about all of these "bombed" buildings is the window frames. When a blast hits a building, the glass generally gives way very easily but the frames in most instances remain still lodged in their sockets. For the frame to seperate from the structure the glass would have to be stronger than the mounting.

The above is the aftermath from a actual bomb test. Notice that some of the inside slates are gone but most of the frames are still intact. However when derelict buildings are condemned in many instances crews remove the windows ($200+ window and frame).

There was also live camera footage of downtown Kiev during the early months of the war. It was really dramatic: crows and lightning. Seriously from the live footage it would have been impossible to tell there was a war.

The above is one of the pictures of "indiscriminately bombed Kiev" months into the war. The above are before/after shots of the bombing from 80 years ago of Dresden.
The above is London: Bombed. That was a picture of Berlin. Somehow Kiev was "indiscriminately bombed" with no visible damage in the majority of the city. So what were the Russians indiscriminately bombing Kiev with, bird poop?.

Under different circumstances the Ukrainian reporting of "Russian atrocities": water bombs, paint bombs, and helicopter-launched wreaking balls and all might have been amusing it is so bad. However in case there are any illusions about the innocence of destroying derelict buildings with wreaking equipment and then displaying them as "Russian atrocities": This is REAL BOMB damage to a building...

In this case it could be thousands or millions of buildings, kinda like the plot from "Sum of All Fears". Probably is just a coincidence.